so, since i saw my first Motion Capture movie "polar Express" the tehnology envolved

and even after "Beowoolf" i realize the pover of animation... but after "AVATAR" i get

the point -this tehnology is future of modern cinema!! Why? Because emotions of

these 3D carachters were far mor behind human actors, and power of my viewers

believe in them was the best one... only by this simple fact, that these blue

humanioids was animated. So here i am at the edge of choosing by my viewers path,

do i want to believe in real human actor, or i can believe with no doubts to animated

character in animated world. I choose 2! Cos in first case, actor is a human like me

and doing his best to emulate story and hero of my inner mind... ok, he is good, but

what next? He is so "correct" and "straight", that i can believe him until one

pont...where i catch myself thinking: ok this is a movie and it can't do nothing with my soul... ok, i cried, laught but thats all..
instead animated character!
Why,
because animated character can do the same things what real actor even more, but differencies

are in my mind, animated character for me is an absoloute, hi is against depicting

documentary real lifes simulation on screen. Even if he will do that same regular

action - drinking tea from cup- who do my mind will believe more? Tom Cruise or Blue

Avatar?... moust will scream Tom, Tom... but i believe mind will catch up on Blue

Avatar tea drinkers actions, cos them are more literature, more abstract, and leave more place

for our mind, our imagination.
And imagination is pushing force for characthers life, even if there are little amount of it. So cant wait until next motion ccapture artpiece... and who knows maybe after 10 years, all dead moviestars will apear in new - upgraded reality films, in what we wil believe more than real Greta Garbo or Humphrey Bogart.